Iran has remained relatively quiet following Israel’s killing of a top Hamas leader, Baha Abu al-Ata, in Gaza. Many experts believe that Iran’s hesitation to retaliate is due to a variety of factors, including strategic considerations and the country’s own internal challenges.
The New York Times reports that Iran, a major supporter of Hamas, has so far refrained from taking immediate military action against Israel in response to al-Ata’s assassination. This is seen as a departure from Iran’s usual swift retaliation in similar situations.
One reason for Iran’s cautious approach is its desire to avoid escalating tensions in the region. The country is already facing significant challenges, including economic sanctions and domestic unrest, and may be wary of getting embroiled in a wider conflict with Israel.
Additionally, some experts believe that Iran may be biding its time and waiting for the right opportunity to strike back. The country is known for its patient and strategic approach to conflicts, and may be planning a more calculated response in the near future.
However, the New York Times notes that Iran’s silence on the issue may also be a sign of its weakening influence in the region. The country’s traditional allies, such as Iraq and Lebanon, have been facing their own internal challenges, which could limit Iran’s ability to muster a strong response against Israel.
Overall, Iran’s decision to hold off on retaliating against Israel for the killing of al-Ata is driven by a combination of strategic considerations and internal challenges. While the country may be weighing its options carefully, it remains to be seen what course of action Iran will ultimately take in response to the assassination.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com